| The
use of deicing salts to remove ice and snow from highways, streets
and bridge decks has caused serious corrosion of the reinforcing
steel in concrete. Metallic
coatings for the protection of a basis metal such as iron
fall into two broad classes those which give sacrificial
protection, and those which do not. Metals that are more active
than iron, such as zinc and cadmium, give sacrificial protection
to iron. Sacrificial protection is of value where the coating
metal is likely to be damaged and the underlying metal exposed.
On
the other hand, non-sacrificial metals, such as nickel, are
more noble than iron and protect by forming a complete envelope.
Nickel protects iron in a variety of environments and has
been used as a coating for dowel pins in highway construction.
With
reinforcing rods, there is always the possibility that rough
handling will cause a break in the coating. A break in a non-sacrificial
type of coating, depending on the pH of the corrosive medium,
may cause the exposed basis metal to corrode more rapidly
than it would if it were not coupled with the nobler metal.
Galvanic-cell experiments were thus performed in connection
with the National Cooperative Highway Research Program to
establish the magnitude and direction of these possible galvanic
effects.
It was concluded that, under the alkaline conditions prevalent
in sound concrete, a break in a nickel coating would not be
a serious problem. In case of neutral or slightly acidic environments,
heavier coatings of nickel (3-5 mils thick) are appropriate.
The heavier coating can resist rough handling, and it is unlikely
to be disrupted to the point of exposing the steel. Cut ends
will, of course, expose the steel, but because of their location,
there is little threat of the reinforcing rod failing even
if corrosion does occur.
|